Friday, December 28, 2007

The Year in Art: By the Archivist



1.
Best Painting Show: Neo Rauch at the Met

2. Best Group Show: M*A*S*H 2007, Curated by Amy Smith-Stewart and Omar Lopez-Chahoud

3. Best Gallery Show: Hany Armanious at Foxy Production

4. Best Retrospective: Zhang Huan: Altered States

5. Best Sculpture Show: Michael Jones McKean at Sunday Gallery LES

6. Best New LES Gallery: Sunday Gallery and Smith-Stewart Gallery

7. Best Painting Flop of 2007: Jules de Balincourt at Zach Feuer

8. Best Sculpture Flop of 2007: Banks Violette at Team and Gladstone Gallery

9. Worst Museum Show: Terence Koh at the Whitney Museum

10. Best Old-Timer-that's-still-got-it Show: Paul McCarthy at Maccarone

11. Worst New-Comer-That-Will-Never-Have-It: Aaron Young

12. Biggest Upset: Documenta 12, Venice Biennale, and Munster

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Unmonumental: The New Museum

We arrived at the New Museum at 3:00 hoping to get in free, my friend had thought that it was going to be free for the first 30 days, but it was only free for the first 30 hours. So... 12 dollars later we were entering the steel, drywall, and concrete palace that is the symbol of the modernist white cube. The museum is a great blank slate of opportunity that may offer up some controversial shows, complete flops, and what we hope will be some historic exhibitions. 

It's amazing that the building cost 55 million, my friend noted that it felt like the "Ikea of museums". It's sleek, simple, kinda cheap, but nice. I thought this was the perfect metaphor for the New Museum, it was going to switch ideas and exhibitions the same way that Ikea changes their displays every month or season. I kinda like the idea that a museum will follow the current trends, and try to have their finger on the pulse of contemporary art. 

The first show "Unmonumental" was curated by Richard Flood, the chief curator of the museum, and I'm under the assumption that he will have his hand in most every show in the near future. I'm not going to critique the show in terms of what I believe is good or bad, because I respect the fact that the museum is exposing a trend which is so explicitly revealed here. Most of the time curators are trying to find a diverse group of artist that are all making different types of work, but that have small threads that connect them either conceptually or visually. But this show blasts the strategy out of the water, Flood decided to choose 30 or so artist that combined look like a solo artist exhibition. 

I felt like the show was similar to what I hope to do with this blog, figure out who's who and what's what in the art world. "Unmonumental" brings together artist making sculpture out of junk, found objects, and cardboard. They have commissioned some of the artist to create unique works for the show, one the most astounding was by Gedi Sibony. This guy was probably given 10,000 or so to make a cardboard, plastic tarp, and plywood installation that seems to have been dragged out of a garbage bin and thrown into the museum. The poor guide that is provided by the museum tried to explain this piece to me, and of course I asked her to explain it to me, since it was one of the most ridiculous installations in the show. It was pretty funny... the conversation went something like this....

me: so... what does it mean?

guide: well... it doesn't really mean anything... (she liked looking at it from a certain angle, which she positioned me in)... you have to get past the fact that the materials look like trash... this work is very difficult

me: really?

guide: yeah... i love the title (she walks me over to read it to me). I'm not sure how it relates to the installation, but I really like it...

The title was some pedantic bull shit that had nothing to do with the trash that the museum paid good money for.

me: wow... how much did the museum pay for this?

guide: oh... they don't tell me those kinds of things...

me: well, knowing that would make it much more interesting, don't you think?

NO RESPONSE... awkward moment....

To me, Sibony was fucking with the entire institution, getting paid to pick out some trash and display it... remind you of anyone... R. Mutt...

guide: We all understand that he is not the first artist to make art this way, but the museum was very excited to have him make this work...

me: wow... thanks for the explanation... that really helped... 

guide: thank you for asking... (i think i was the most work she had done all day)

Recap:

  • The work meant nothing
  • was difficult
  • expensive
  • had been done before
  • and had a nice title with no significance... 
Now that's what I call contemporary art.

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Miami Love





WOW!! Miami was fucking amazing!! I've heard so many stories in the past about how great the Miami Art Fairs are, but until I had the chance to experience them for myself, I had no idea what people were actually talking about, it kinda felt like a myth, but now... I'm here to say that Miami is the Playground for the art world!

Let me start by making a correction, there were actually 24 Fairs, not 18, I had a chance to see about 15 or so. I've ranked the top 10 from best to worst. 

1. Scope
2. Aqua Wynwood
3. Pulse
4. Nada
5. Photo Miami
6. Art Basel
7. Art Miami
8. Zones
9. Bridge
10. Red Dot

Okay, so let me explain. Scope was number 1 because they had the youngest and most experimental work. It was a huge fair that felt ambitious and fresh. Scope had a great range of galleries from all over the world, and the work was engaging (don't get me wrong, there was some real shit there too) but overall the fair had a great energy about it. Aqua was well organized, the art chosen was beautiful, and the presentation was better than any other fair. Pulse had some really great galleries, but the fair was slightly boring and predictable. Nada was a complete snoozer, but the galleries there are some of the best, up and coming... they have some high price art, but so many of the artist shown had sub-par work, and weren't represented well in this format. Photo Miami is next, they put together a sophisticated fair that had great presentation, but it's kinda difficult to weed out what's good from bad. 

All five of those fairs come ahead of Art Basel. Why? Well... Basel is the Monster, the Giant, the Fair that people travel the globe to visit, but One major thing is missing. NEW ART! Walking through Basel feels like walking through a history class. Maybe it's new art to some collectors or the lay audience, but for anyone who keeps up with the current art world, they are not looking at Basel to reveal what's new and hot. Basel felt like a secondary market fair that had art world giants exhibiting their commercial work. Nothing interesting comes from a fair that's simply about who will pay 100,000 dollars for a tiny drawing. The younger fairs reveal what is being made by the next generation. Maybe that's not important, but I am certainly more interested in what will be happening in the future rather than what the old guys have been doing for decades.

And "Art Positions" is a FUCKING JOKE! why the fuck would any respectable gallery pay money to exhibit their hard working artist in a container. This does no justice to the art or artist. This section of Basel is an embarrassment, and should be done away with. It's not hip or cool, or "kinda interesting" it's simply a joke to make an extra buck by the Fair. 

And for "Art Supernova"... when I see a supernova i'll let you know... none in sight yet. All though there was a cool piece that had two fans keeping a cassette tape string floating in air. But the rest was just boring.